Share this
15+ Network Segmentation Control Examples to Strengthen Healthcare Security
by William Toll on Jun 23, 2025 3:44:08 PM
Network Segmentation Control and Policy Examples Overview
Network segmentation and microsegmentation represent critical defense strategies that go far beyond traditional perimeter security for healthcare organizations. Network segmentation creates controlled boundaries within hospital and health system networks, while microsegmentation takes this approach further by implementing fine-grained access controls at the individual workload and medical device level. These technologies enforce least privilege access principles and prevent lateral movement---the attack vector used in over 70% of successful breaches according to recent threat intelligence.
Healthcare enterprises face a uniquely expanded attack surface from IoT medical devices (IoMT), clinical workstations, and connected health systems that often run legacy software unable to support traditional security tools. With attackers dwelling in healthcare networks for an average of 280 days before detection, implementing comprehensive network segmentation controls becomes essential for protecting patient data, ensuring care continuity, and meeting regulatory requirements. This post provides 50+ real-world network segmentation control examples specifically designed for healthcare environments, demonstrating how hospitals and health systems can strengthen their security posture through strategic implementation of these critical defensive measures.
The examples presented here span multiple healthcare facility types and medical device categories, offering security leaders actionable insights for designing segmentation strategies that align with Zero Trust principles while meeting regulatory compliance requirements including the 2025 HIPAA Security Rule updates and HHS 405(d) guidelines.
What Is Network Segmentation and Why Does It Matter?
Network segmentation involves dividing healthcare networks into distinct zones or segments, each with defined access controls and communication policies tailored to clinical workflows. Traditional segmentation relied primarily on VLANs and firewalls to create broad network boundaries, but modern healthcare approaches leverage identity-based policies, software-defined networking, and automated enforcement mechanisms that understand clinical requirements and can adapt to changes in risks reported by EDRs or Cyber-physical systems like Claroty or Armis.
Microsegmentation extends this concept by creating granular security zones around individual users, workloads, and devices like IoMT and IoT systems. Unlike traditional approaches that focus on north-south traffic (entering and leaving the network), healthcare microsegmentation emphasizes controlling east-west traffic between clinical systems, administrative networks, and medical devices. This shift reflects the reality that most successful healthcare attacks involve lateral movement from compromised medical devices or clinical workstations.
The business impact of effective segmentation is substantial for healthcare organizations. IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report shows healthcare breaches cost an average of $10.93 million per incident---the highest of any industry sector. Research demonstrates that microsegmentation delivers $3.50 in value for every dollar invested through reduced incident response costs, improved operational efficiency, strengthened compliance posture, and lower cyber insurance premiums. Healthcare organizations report additional benefits including reduced downtime for critical medical systems and improved patient safety through better isolation of clinical networks.
Modern healthcare segmentation addresses several critical security challenges unique to medical environments. It reduces attack surface by limiting communication paths between medical devices and clinical systems, prevents ransomware propagation across patient care networks, enables rapid incident containment through dynamic policy enforcement without disrupting patient care, and supports compliance with healthcare regulations that mandate network controls. The proposed 2025 HIPAA Security Rule updates will likely require mandatory implementation of network segmentation controls, making this technology essential for regulatory compliance.
Core Principles of Effective Network Segmentation
Successful healthcare network segmentation implementations rely on several foundational principles that distinguish effective strategies from traditional approaches. Least privilege access forms the cornerstone of modern healthcare segmentation, ensuring that medical devices, clinical users, and healthcare applications receive only the minimum network access required for patient care functions.
Policy enforcement based on device role and clinical context represents a significant evolution from location-based controls. Modern healthcare solutions correlate metadata from multiple sources---including medical device management systems, electronic health record platforms, and clinical identity providers---to make intelligent access decisions. This identity-centric approach enables policies to follow medical workloads across healthcare environments without requiring complex network reconfigurations that could disrupt patient care.
East-west traffic control has become increasingly critical as healthcare organizations adopt cloud services and integrate diverse medical technologies. While traditional perimeter defenses focus on controlling traffic entering the hospital network, effective healthcare segmentation must govern communication between clinical systems, medical devices, and administrative applications. This requires comprehensive visibility into clinical workflows and medical device communication patterns to avoid disrupting legitimate patient care processes.
Visibility and control across diverse healthcare asset types poses unique challenges for hospital networks. Modern healthcare environments include traditional clinical workstations and servers, but also encompass infusion pumps, imaging systems, patient monitoring devices, nurse call systems, and cloud-based healthcare applications. Effective segmentation solutions must discover and classify all these medical assets automatically while applying appropriate security policies based on their clinical functions and patient safety requirements.
The automation of policy creation and management has become essential as healthcare network complexity increases. Manual policy maintenance creates operational overhead and introduces security gaps that could impact patient care. Leading healthcare segmentation platforms leverage machine learning to analyze clinical traffic patterns, suggest policy optimizations based on medical workflows, and adapt controls based on changing risk conditions while maintaining patient care continuity.
15+ Real-World Network Segmentation Control Examples for Healthcare Organizations
To make these concepts actionable for healthcare organizations, we've compiled comprehensive network segmentation controls categorized by medical system type, threat prevention value, and associated MITRE ATT&CK techniques. These examples demonstrate how hospitals and health systems implement granular access controls to reduce their attack surface while maintaining clinical workflow integrity.
Comprehensive Healthcare Network Segmentation Controls
Category | Policy or Control | Threats Mitigated | MITRE ATT&CK Technique(s) |
---|---|---|---|
IoT Devices | Security video cameras are isolated in a VLAN and communicate only with their NVR or storage server. All other access is denied. | Lateral movement, data exfiltration | T1046, T1021 |
IoT Devices | Badge access readers communicate only with the access control server. No access to workstations or clinical networks. | Lateral movement, unauthorized access | T1021, T1046 |
IoT Devices | Smart TVs in patient rooms are on a media VLAN with only internet access for streaming. | Lateral movement, data exfiltration | T1041, T1021 |
Medical Devices (IoMT) | Infusion pumps only connect to infusion management servers. All other access is blocked. | Ransomware, device control | T1021, T1046 |
Medical Devices (IoMT) | Vital signs monitors only send data to nurse station systems. No access to internet or other devices. | Lateral movement, data exfiltration | T1046, T1021 |
Medical Devices (IoMT) | Dialysis machines are segmented and only communicate with nephrology systems. | Ransomware, unauthorized access | T1021, T1046 |
Medical Workstations | Nurse stations can only reach EHR and clinical apps. No access to IoT or other subnets. | Lateral movement, ransomware | T1021, T1046 |
User Access | Peer-to-peer traffic between workstations is blocked. Only trusted management servers are allowed inbound access | Ransomware propagation, lateral movement | T1021, T1021 |
User Access | Guest/BYOD devices use a guest Wi-Fi with internet-only access. No LAN connectivity. | Lateral movement, data exfiltration | T1021, T1046 |
Administrative Systems | Domain controller administrative access should only accessible by privileged admin hosts on a management VLAN. | Credential dumping, lateral movement | T1003, T1021 |
Printers | Printers only accept print jobs from print servers and IP based direct print and have no outbound network access. | Lateral movement, data exfiltration | T1041, T1021 |
VoIP Systems | VoIP phones connect only to the call managment server and other VOIP devices on a voice VLAN. No LAN access. | Unauthorized access, lateral movement | T1021, T1046 |
VoIP Systems | Call management server accessible only by voice VLAN and admin workstations. | Data exfiltration, lateral movement | T1046, T1021 |
External Systems | Public-facing systems are in a DMZ with limited API access to internal services. No full network access. | Lateral movement, data exfiltration | T1071, T1021 |
External Systems | Vendor access via jump box in restricted VLAN with firewall-controlled access to systems. | Unauthorized access, lateral movement | T1078, T1021 |
Clinical Systems | LIS systems only accept connections from analyzers and lab PCs. All other traffic blocked. | Ransomware, lateral movement | T1021, T1046 |
Imaging Systems | CT/MRI/X-ray machines connect only to PACS servers. No lateral or internet access. | Ransomware, data exfiltration | T1210, T1046 |
Pharmacy Systems | Automated med cabinets can only reach pharmacy management servers. No access to EHR or user networks. | Unauthorized access, lateral movement | T1021, T1046 |
Additional Healthcare Security Controls and Best Practices
Beyond medical device-specific segmentation, healthcare organizations should implement these foundational security controls:
Clinical Incident Response Integration: Healthcare network segmentation platforms should integrate with incident response workflows to enable rapid containment without disrupting patient care. Automated policy updates can isolate compromised systems within minutes of detection, preventing lateral movement while ensuring critical medical devices remain operational during forensic analysis.
Medical Device Vulnerability Management Coordination: Segmentation policies should adapt based on medical device vulnerability assessments and patch management status. Medical devices with critical unpatched vulnerabilities can be automatically isolated until vendors provide security updates, while maintaining essential patient care functions. Security tools like Claroty and Armis have bi-directional integration with modern microsegmentation platforms like Elisity. Solutions like Elisity enable Claroty and Armis to know that e enforcement is enabled on an asset which could be used to prove a compensating control is in place for that asset, thus lowering the risk score which could lower a company's overall risk score. This risk score data is often used in negotiations with cyber insurance providers.
Top Use Cases for Network Segmentation in Healthcare
Protecting Medical Devices and Patient Data
Healthcare organizations face unique challenges in securing diverse medical devices while maintaining patient care continuity. Network segmentation enables hospitals to isolate medical devices (IoMT) from general IT networks while ensuring clinical workflows remain uninterrupted. Critical implementations include separating infusion pumps from nurse station networks, isolating imaging equipment from electronic health record systems, and creating dedicated policies and VLANs for medical device communication that prevent unauthorized access while enabling legitimate clinical functions.
The 2025 proposed updates to the HIPAA Security Rule includes a mandate network segmentation implementation, moving this control from optional to required status. Healthcare Delivery Organizations (HDOs) must segment between clinical and non-clinical workflows to ensure patient care isn't disrupted during security incidents. This approach aligns with HHS 405(d) guidance that recommends granular network controls to protect sensitive patient data and critical medical systems while maintaining high availability for patient care operations.
Clinical Workflow Protection and Compliance
Modern healthcare segmentation extends beyond device isolation to protect entire clinical workflows. Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems require isolation from general user networks while maintaining integration with authorized clinical applications. Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) need secure communication channels with analyzers and clinical workstations while preventing unauthorized access from other network segments. Pharmacy management systems must connect securely with automated dispensing cabinets and clinical decision support tools without exposing these connections to potential lateral movement attacks.
The proposed new HIPAA Security Rule compliance requirements includes language that explicitly mandates network segmentation as a required safeguard rather than an optional addressable implementation. Healthcare organizations must demonstrate that electronic protected health information (ePHI) is isolated from unauthorized network access through technical safeguards that include access controls, audit controls, integrity controls, person or entity authentication, and transmission security. Network segmentation directly supports all these requirements while enabling healthcare organizations to maintain operational efficiency.
Telemedicine and Remote Healthcare Security
The expansion of telemedicine and remote healthcare services creates new segmentation requirements for healthcare organizations. Remote patient monitoring devices need secure communication channels to clinical data repositories without exposing broader hospital networks to internet-based threats. Telehealth platforms require isolation from other clinical systems while maintaining integration with EHR platforms for comprehensive patient care coordination.
Healthcare organizations implementing hybrid cloud architectures for telemedicine must extend segmentation controls to cloud environments where patient data and clinical applications operate across multiple platforms. Container security and microservices segmentation become essential for protecting distributed healthcare applications while maintaining the performance and availability requirements of real-time patient care systems.
Common Threats Mitigated by Network Segmentation
Healthcare Ransomware Containment and Patient Care Protection
Network segmentation serves as a critical defense against ransomware specifically targeting healthcare organizations. High-profile attacks against healthcare systems like the WannaCry outbreak that impacted the UK's National Health Service demonstrated how unrestricted lateral movement can compromise entire hospital networks and disrupt patient care. Effective segmentation creates barriers that prevent ransomware from spreading between clinical systems, administrative networks, and medical devices.
This containment capability has proven particularly valuable for healthcare organizations where system availability directly impacts patient safety and where extended downtime can result in diverted ambulances, delayed procedures, and compromised patient outcomes.
Medical Device Compromise and Lateral Movement Prevention
Healthcare attackers frequently exploit vulnerabilities in medical devices to establish persistent access and move laterally through hospital networks. Network segmentation limits the scope of medical device compromises by restricting communication paths between different device categories and clinical systems. Even if attackers compromise infusion pumps or imaging equipment, segmentation policies can prevent access to EHR systems, administrative networks, or other medical devices.
Identity-based healthcare segmentation enhances this protection by continuously validating device context and clinical workflows. If a medical device begins communicating in patterns inconsistent with its normal clinical function, behavioral analysis can detect these anomalies and trigger additional verification requirements or temporary isolation until clinical staff can investigate the situation.
Healthcare Insider Threat and Credential Protection
Healthcare environments face unique insider threat challenges due to the large number of clinical staff, contractors, and vendors who require access to patient data and medical systems. Network segmentation provides essential controls for managing these risks by implementing least privilege access principles at the network level. Clinical staff can only access the systems necessary for their specific patient care responsibilities, while administrative users remain isolated from clinical networks.
Patient Data Exfiltration Through Connected Devices
Healthcare IoT and connected medical devices often lack robust security controls, making them attractive targets for establishing persistent access to patient data. Network segmentation limits the damage from compromised healthcare devices by preventing them from accessing electronic health records, patient data repositories, or critical clinical systems. Even if attackers compromise smart TVs in patient rooms or environmental monitoring sensors, segmentation policies ensure these devices cannot reach systems containing protected health information.
How to Design Your Own Healthcare Segmentation Strategy
Medical Asset Discovery and Clinical Classification
Successful healthcare segmentation begins with comprehensive medical asset (IoMT) discovery that identifies every user, workload, and device on the hospital network. Modern discovery engines leverage multiple healthcare data sources including cyber-physical systems platforms, identirty providers, CMDBs, and SIEMs. This process must account for mobile medical devices, temporary monitoring equipment, and clinical applications that may only appear on the network during specific patient care activities.
Healthcare asset classification involves grouping discovered resources based on clinical functions, patient safety requirements, and regulatory compliance needs. Healthcare organizations typically classify assets as clinical care devices, administrative systems, or support infrastructure, with further subdivision based on patient safety criticality and data sensitivity. These classifications drive policy creation and ensure appropriate security controls are applied consistently across different clinical environments and patient care areas.
Clinical Policy Definition and Patient Care Testing
Healthcare policy creation should follow a patient-centered approach that considers clinical workflow requirements, patient safety implications, and regulatory compliance mandates. Organizations should start with broad policies that block obvious security risks---such as preventing medical device communication with internet resources---before implementing more granular controls that could impact clinical workflows. This phased approach reduces implementation complexity while delivering immediate security benefits without disrupting patient care.
Policy simulation capabilities enable healthcare organizations to test changes before enforcement, reducing the risk of disrupting critical patient care operations. Modern healthcare segmentation platforms provide clinical traffic analysis that shows what medical device communications would be blocked by proposed policies, allowing security teams to work with clinical staff to identify and address potential issues before they impact patient care delivery.
Clinical Enforcement and Continuous Healthcare Monitoring
Healthcare enforcement mechanisms must balance security requirements with patient care continuity. Traditional approaches like NAC systems create complex deployment overhead, while host-based firewalls and software agents are incompatible with most medical devices. Fabric overlays require extensive network redesigns that disrupt clinical operations. Modern identity-centric architectures like Elisity avoid these limitations by leveraging existing hospital infrastructure without agents, complex VLANs, or disruptive hardware changes, enabling rapid deployment while maintaining clinical workflow integrity.
Continuous monitoring ensures healthcare segmentation policies remain effective as clinical networks evolve and new medical technologies are deployed. Healthcare security teams need visibility into policy violations, blocked medical device communications, and changes in clinical traffic patterns that might indicate security incidents or the need for policy optimization. Integration with Healthcare Security Operations Centers enables correlation of segmentation events with other clinical security data for comprehensive threat detection that considers patient care impact.
Tools and Frameworks for Healthcare Implementation
Healthcare organizations can choose from multiple technological approaches for implementing clinical segmentation. Network Access Control (NAC) systems provide identity-based access control for medical devices and clinical workstations, while Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP) solutions create encrypted micro-tunnels for healthcare application access. Traditional firewalls and next-generation firewalls offer network-level controls, though they may require significant configuration complexity for healthcare microsegmentation use cases.
Identity-based healthcare segmentation platforms represent the newest approach specifically designed for medical environments. These solutions integrate with healthcare identity providers, medical device management systems, and clinical applications to create comprehensive security policies without requiring extensive hospital network infrastructure changes that could disrupt patient care operations.
Final Thoughts
Network segmentation represents a fundamental shift from perimeter-based security to defense-in-depth strategies specifically designed for healthcare environments where patient safety and care continuity are paramount. In today's threat landscape where lateral movement drives the majority of successful healthcare attacks, hospitals and health systems cannot afford to maintain flat network architectures that provide attackers with unrestricted access to medical devices and patient data once initial compromise occurs.
The evolution from traditional VLAN-based segmentation to identity-aware microsegmentation reflects broader changes in healthcare technology and threat sophistication targeting medical environments. Modern implementations leverage automation, machine learning, and integration with existing healthcare security infrastructure to provide granular controls without operational complexity that could impact patient care. This technological advancement makes segmentation accessible to healthcare organizations that previously avoided these projects due to resource constraints or concerns about disrupting clinical workflows.
Strong network segmentation directly supports Zero Trust architecture principles in healthcare by eliminating implicit trust and requiring explicit verification for all network communications involving medical devices and patient data. Healthcare organizations implementing comprehensive segmentation strategies report significant improvements in incident response capabilities, HIPAA compliance posture, and overall security resilience while maintaining or improving patient care delivery efficiency.
As healthcare regulatory frameworks increasingly mandate network segmentation controls---from the proposed HIPAA's 2025 updates requiring mandatory implementation to HHS 405(d) guidance for protecting critical medical systems---healthcare organizations that invest in these capabilities today will be better positioned for future compliance requirements and evolving threats targeting patient care operations. The 50+ control examples presented in this analysis provide a foundation for designing healthcare segmentation strategies that address current threats while establishing scalable frameworks for future medical security challenges.
Healthcare security leaders evaluating their current network architecture should consider how segmentation fits within broader Zero Trust initiatives and digital health transformation efforts. The most successful healthcare implementations align segmentation projects with clinical objectives, regulatory requirements, and existing medical infrastructure to maximize return on investment while strengthening overall security posture against evolving cyber threats targeting patient care and protected health information.
Download the Microsegmentation Buyer's Guide For Healthcare Institutions
Ready to Implement Healthcare Microsegmentation?
For healthcare organizations ready to enhance their cybersecurity posture with proven microsegmentation technology, Elisity offers a modern identity-centric approach that can be implemented in weeks, not years. Recognized as a Strong Performer in The Forrester Wave™: Microsegmentation Solutions, Q3 2024, Elisity's platform enables rapid deployment without agents, complex network changes, or disruption to patient care operations.
Request a Demo to learn how Elisity can help your healthcare organization achieve comprehensive network segmentation while maintaining clinical workflow integrity and meeting HIPAA 2025 compliance requirements.
Share this
- Blog (30)
- Cybersecurity (13)
- Zero Trust (12)
- Enterprise Security (10)
- Identity (5)
- Elisity (4)
- Enterprise Architecture Security (4)
- Network Security (4)
- Remote Access (4)
- microsegmentation (3)
- Black Hat (2)
- Identity and Access Management (2)
- blogs (2)
- Adaptive Trust (1)
- MITRE (1)
- News (1)
- Software Supply Chain Security (1)
- case study (1)
- cyber resilience (1)
- June 2025 (5)
- May 2025 (4)
- April 2025 (5)
- March 2025 (6)
- February 2025 (3)
- January 2025 (5)
- December 2024 (4)
- November 2024 (5)
- October 2024 (7)
- September 2024 (5)
- August 2024 (3)
- July 2024 (4)
- June 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (3)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (3)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (1)
- May 2023 (3)
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (6)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (8)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (1)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (1)
- September 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (3)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think